立春节气即将到来 南方进入“雨雨雨”模式******
中新网北京2月3日电(韦香惠)立春节气将于2月4日到来。据中国天气网消息，未来三天(2月3日至5日)，南方多地维持阴雨频繁的天气格局，而北方下周一前，大部地区维持晴朗，气温将陆续回升。
2月2日，昆明冬日暖阳和煦，吸引大批游客来到海埂大坝，与越冬红嘴鸥互动。 中新社记者 刘冉阳 摄南方有持续性阴雨天气
2月上旬，南方大部地区将在持续阴雨中度过，降雨日数普遍将达5至7天，贵州东部和华南、江南南部可达8至9天，湖南、江西、广西北部、广东北部降雨量将较常年同期明显偏多，当地居民需注意防范局地持续性降雨可能引发的滑坡、崩塌等次生灾害，同时，公众需关注道路湿滑、能见度降低对交通运输等的不利影响。
其中，2月3日至5日，江淮、江汉、江南、华南及西南地区东部有小到中雨，广西、湖南等地的部分地区有大雨，局地暴雨。
此外，2月6日至9日，中东部地区将出现较大范围降水过程，江淮、江南、华南等地有中到大雨，局地暴雨；西北地区东南部、华北、黄淮等地的部分地区有小到中雪或雨夹雪，局地大雪。此外，受冷空气影响，中东部地区将有大风降温天气。
未来11-14天(2月11-14日)，南方地区仍多阴雨天气，江淮、江汉、江南、华南及西南地区东部等地累计降水量有15~40毫米。西北地区东部、西南地区等地气温较常年同期偏低1～2℃，我国其余大部地区气温较常年同期偏高1℃左右。
全国降水量预报图(2月3日08时-4日08时) 图片来源：中国天气网北方大部晴朗升温
气温方面，随着冷空气影响接近尾声，北方大部昨天起陆续开启升温模式，不少地区最高气温累计升幅将达6~8℃。预计4日至6日，西北地区东部、华北中南部、黄淮等地最高气温又将回到10℃以上。
不过，在南方地区，受冷空气和阴雨共同影响，江淮、江汉、江南等地今天湿冷感持续，最高气温大多维持在个位数运行。4日，降温主要集中在长江以南地区，云南至华南多地也将出现2~6℃降温，5日开始，南方多地也将进入气温回升通道。
此外，下周初，新一股冷空气的到来将给中东部带来雨雪降温天气过程，气象部门建议公众关注气温变化，及时调整衣着，谨防呼吸系统和心脑血管疾病。
国家气象中心高级工程师任宏昌在《人民日报》撰文称，立春时节，虽然天气开始慢慢回暖，但早晚温差仍然很大。他提醒，一方面，应当及时关注最新发布的天气预报和预警信息，为出行提供指导；另一方面，在大部分地区，也要注意保暖。
任宏昌表示，民间俗语“春捂秋冻”是有一定道理的，注意保暖可以让身体对多变的天气有一个逐步适应的过程。大家可用多层穿衣法来应对天气变化，保护身体健康。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
